DISCLAIMER
This is the blog by me, by Vaccinius, that is Anders Woje Ellingsen, as the creator of Trixnix. All content on this blog, and all content by me elsewhere on Trixnix, is by me as a private person. I do not represent any state, any church, any organization or any community. Google, and by Google the company Blogger, is responsible for the technical presentation of the web sites on Trixnix, and benefiting from the service, I respect the terms of use as any other individual using the services of Google does. I love the services of Google.
Vaccinius

Thursday, 5 September 2019

The history of ideas

The historical epochs in human history, in the university of Oslo made a study, called idea history, might be perceived as a growth to something unknown, though improving mankind. Those historical epochs can, though, also be perceived as a dialectical fight between some kind of romantics and some kind of rationality, making a new feeling, that is, an epoch of romantics. This understanding is not revolutionary. Scientists oriented towards theory have pointed at it, in the local. Ai have stated the historical epochs from Christ up to the times of ours is my body, being the Girl, and so, and aI have approved the historical epochs by their labels, as taught in Norway.

In that latter sense, that is by a dialectical understanding, we have reached a climax, so to speak, in the times of ours. This is marked by the technology of data, by which that pure intellectual and instrumental orientation seems to have a certain power in itself, and by which a devastating relation to the soft kindness is produced, being either by or relieved from.

What man ought to have in mind, is that those producers of that new technology are means. And, that by a little creativity, God given, it is proven that any of those imbeciles forcing one to acknowledge their superiority are plain idiots, and evil, since they commit adultery on the idealistic level. What will come after this, is a new romantic epoch. That is for certain. And, it will be quite interesting, since mankind has reached this climax, so to speak. Are we heading at an conceiving of mankind? Or, is that diversion between woman and man as romantics and intellect much to simple to accept that thing? Myself, being a man, aI think the woman is a pretty thing.

That dialectical understanding of history one might perceive everywhere, aI believe. Is there not a connection between Homer and Vergil, for instance? Not to speak about Platon and Aristoteles? Platon came after Homer, and aI believe Homer, and his lot, was the ones carrying that Greek gods. Myself, when studying Aristoteles, aI thought he was stupid and wrong, by his orientation. Thinking about it, having giving up the studies, aI came to the conclusion, though, he was up to something. Which Marx later built on, in fact, and which the Jews relied on, as a matter of fact. And which constitutes Norway. That materialistic way of thinking. The problem with Aristoteles, aI came to, is that he did not believe in God, as the Jewish people did, and that his pursuing of matters of fact lead to what ridiculous is.

.·: † :·.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Welcome be to leave a message, 
serious, or just for fun. ~ 
Kindly do no harm or damage: 
State your name. And kiss The Son.